Which of the Following Is a Factor That Can Lead to Increased Group Cohesion?
Group Cohesiveness
Cohesiveness defines the degree of closeness that the members feel with the group. Information technology identifies the strength of the fellow member's desires to remain in the group and the caste of commitment to the group. The extent of cohesiveness depends upon many factors including the compatibility of individual goals with grouping goals. The more the members are attracted to each other and the more the group goals align with their private goals, the greater grouping's cohesiveness.
Similarly, less attraction of members towards each other will lessen the strength of cohesiveness. There may be situations where an individual may go a fellow member of a country club for the sake of his own prestige or career enhancement or for making selective friends for his concern interests. These reasons for joining the group will undermine the strength of cohesiveness.
Factors Contributing to Group Cohesiveness
In that location are many factors that foster the cohesion of the grouping. Some of the more of import factors are illustrated below:
Fourth dimension Together: Information technology is quite natural that the more than fourth dimension people spend together, the more they will get to know each other and more tendency there volition exist to go closer to each other, thus strengthening the caste of cohesiveness. This is based upon the supposition that yous volition spend more than fourth dimension with only those whom you like personally and want to continue interacting with them.
These interactions typically atomic number 82 to common interests and increased attraction. The thought of long courtships or the idea that couples live together earlier spousal relationship is primarily to ensure that at that place volition be a high degree of cohesiveness in the marriage if the couple gets to know each other well by spending more time together and in shut proximity to each other.
In an organizational setting, people who work near each other are more probable to spend more than time together. For example, amid clerical workers in one organization, it was establish that distance between their desks was the single virtually important determinant of the charge per unit of interaction amidst them.
Group Size: Since continuous and shut interaction amidst members is a fundamental necessity for cohesiveness, it would be natural to presume that big groups restrict the extent of advice and interaction with each other, thus resulting in the reduction of degree of cohesiveness.
Another problem with big size groups is that there is a likelihood of forming small groups within the big groups. This would result in the dilution of the mutual group goal thus increasing the extent of power politics play. This tends to decrease the overall cohesiveness.
Another interesting aspect about group cohesion depends upon whether the group is all male, all female or mixed. Studies showed that if all members were of the aforementioned sex so smell groups had better cohesion than large ones. Only when the groups were made upward of both males and females, then larger groups had better cohesion. Information technology seems that people like to join mixed groups than single sex groups and an opportunity to interact with a larger set of both sexes increases cohesiveness.
Hard in Entry: Some groups are not like shooting fish in a barrel to join. The members are very carefully selected and the selected fellow member feels a sense of pride and achievement. The more difficult information technology is to get into a grouping, the more cohesive that group becomes. The reason existence that in exclusive and aristocracy groups the members are selected on the ground of certain characteristics and these characteristics being common to all add to the caste of liking and attraction towards each other.
The more sectional the grouping, the more is the closeness amongst members. Accordingly, individuals like to join such exclusive groups. That is one reason, for instance, why many bright students want to study at Harvard and Princeton universities. Similarly, sectional yacht clubs and golf clubs have applicants on their waiting lists for many years before they are accustomed.
Threat and Competition: Whenever the common group goal is threatened, cohesiveness increases. Also, such cohesiveness increases the importance of the goals. When nosotros fight for a goal and then the goal gets the highest priority. For case, when a hostile group wants to take over a corporation, the Board of Directors of the corporation suddenly becomes a united front confronting the threats and their cohesiveness reaches its peak.
Similarly, management threats frequently join an otherwise disarrayed union. Thus the threatening party will have less chance of success when faced with a unified force.
Previous Successes: When a group achieves a meaningful goal, the cohesiveness of the group increases because the success is shared by all the members and each one feels responsible for the achievement. For instance, when a sports team wins an important game, every one in the team congratulates every other member of the team for this success.
Particularly, if a grouping has a series of successes, it builds a united team spirit. For this reason, successful companies find it easier to hire new talented employees. Similarly, prestigious universities are never curt of applicants for admission. This proves that every 1 loves a winner.
Similarity of Attitudes and Values: One of the strongest sources of group cohesiveness is the similarity in values, morals, beliefs and code of bear. We savour the company of others who hold like opinions and characteristics every bit ourselves. That is ane reason why interfaith marriages are discouraged. Similarity of interests is specially important when the grouping's chief goal is that of creating a friendly interpersonal climate.
This increases group cohesiveness. This factor may not be and then important if the goal is task oriented. For example, if an ground forces unit of measurement has to win a strategic battle, then the successful task accomplishment becomes the cohesive factor rather than the similarity of interests because the unit of measurement may consist of blackness soldiers and white soldiers who may not accept much in common.
Source: https://www.managementstudyhq.com/group-cohesiveness.html
0 Response to "Which of the Following Is a Factor That Can Lead to Increased Group Cohesion?"
Post a Comment